Compare
UK subcontractor commercial software, compared
VariationFlow side by side with the tools UK specialist subcontractors use for variations, payment and CVR today, on the same eight questions each time. What we say about another product comes from its own public pages, with the link and the date we read it, and each page says who the other option suits better.
VariationFlow vs Spreadsheets
The QS’s own workbook, in Excel or Google Sheets: a variation register, an application and often a CVR, kept by hand. It is what most specialist subcontractors run today, and it costs nothing extra.
VariationFlow vs VariationDesk
Variation management software for UK specialist subcontractors: capture on site, priced quotations from rate cards, approval by link and tracking through to payment, with a contractor hub for receiving variations from a supply chain.
VariationFlow vs Xpedeon
An enterprise-grade construction ERP for contractors, housebuilders, developers and engineer-to-order firms, with accounting, payroll, procurement and CVR in one system, from a global vendor with a UK company.
VariationFlow vs Procore
An end-to-end construction management platform for main contractors, owners and subcontractors, covering projects, financials and site. It is sold on an upfront annual fee per product, based on annual construction turnover.
VariationFlow vs Archdesk
Construction project management and ERP software for contractors, subcontractors and owners: estimating, variations, applications for payment, site records and the CVR on one platform, synced with an accounting package rather than replacing the ledger.
VariationFlow vs Payapps
Cloud software for applications for payment and certification, used by main contractors and subcontractors together, with variations and retention inside the application. Payapps says it is now an Autodesk company.
VariationFlow vs Access Coins Evo
A modular construction ERP from The Access Group for UK and Irish contractors and homebuilders: financials, job costing, CIS and payroll, with variations and CVR, most commonly used by mid-market and enterprise firms.
VariationFlow vs TrakPro
A web app for main contractors to manage their subcontractors’ payment applications, variations and retention, with a portal where each subcontractor submits its claims.
By question
Something here wrong or out of date? Tell us and we will correct it.
Questions
- What software do UK subcontractors use for variations, payment and CVR?
- Broadly four kinds: the QS’s own spreadsheet; variation management tools built for specialist subcontractors; payment application platforms that main contractors share with their supply chains; and construction management and ERP suites with commercial modules. The comparisons here set VariationFlow beside examples of each on the same eight questions, from each vendor’s own public pages, linked and dated.
- Is change order software the same as variation management software?
- In substance, yes. Change order is the American term. UK contracts say variation (JCT) or compensation event (NEC), and on a UK job the software also has to work the UK deadlines: the NEC4 subcontract’s compensation event periods, JCT notices, and the Construction Act’s payment, pay less and final dates. Check for those by name rather than assuming a change order tool covers them.
- Which is the best commercial software for a UK subcontractor?
- It depends on where the money is being lost. If your main contractors already run a payment platform, joining it may cover your applications. If you need ledgers, payroll and CIS in one system, look at a construction ERP. If variations start on site and the contract deadlines cost you when they are missed, that is what VariationFlow is built for. Each comparison says who the other option suits better.
- How are these comparisons made?
- From each vendor’s own public pages, or a directory listing, with every claim about another product linked to its source and the date it was read, and re-read before that date is a year old. Where we could not find something, the page says it is not stated on their public pages, because absence from a website is not absence from a product.